<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Decibel Guitars &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decibelguitars.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decibelguitars.com</link>
	<description>We make great guitars. We hope you like them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Magnetic/Piezo blend pedal</title>
		<link>http://decibelguitars.com/the-magneticpiezo-blend-pedal/</link>
		<comments>http://decibelguitars.com/the-magneticpiezo-blend-pedal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Decibel Guitars</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blend pedal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piezo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decibelguitars.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evolution of the design of the "DeciBlend" magnetic/piezo blend pedal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since first reading about the Parker Fly in the early 1990s, i was captivated by the idea of having access to both electric and acoustic sounds on one guitar, and being able to flip between them (or blend them) at will. In many ways, this was &#8220;the sound&#8221; i had been hearing in my head for years, and finally there was a guitar that could do it.</p>
<p>Years later, i finally acquired a stunning Parker Fly Classic, and it did not disappoint. Well, except for the fact i found that i wanted to be able to move between the magnetic and piezo sounds while playing, and with two hands already occupied with picking and fretting, that seemed like an ideal task for one of my feet.</p>
<p>Read on&#8230; <span id="more-505"></span></p>
<p>I was surprised to learn that nobody had made a true &#8220;blend&#8221; pedal that worked the same way the magnetic/piezo balance pot worked on the Fly. At one end of the knob&#8217;s travel, it was full magnetic. At the other end, it was full piezo. In the middle, it was 100% of both, with any blend available between the two extremes.</p>
<p>Stereo volume pedals tracked two inputs and two outputs in parallel. Pan pedals usually swept one input between two outputs. And the occasional &#8220;blend&#8221; pedal i found either allowed the player to add the piezo sound to a fixed magnetic sound (like the Fishman PowerBlend pedal) or didn&#8217;t allow 100% of both signals in the middle position.</p>
<p>So i took it upon myself to design and build the pedal i envisioned. </p>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHiGCedFI/AAAAAAAAAhc/zqKv-rVFCQ4/IMG_1616.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-4-2-18-6-7]" title="The first prototype of the magnetic/piezo blend pedal."><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHiGCedFI/AAAAAAAAAhc/zqKv-rVFCQ4/IMG_1616.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="The first prototype of the magnetic/piezo blend pedal." width="512" height="384" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">The first prototype of the magnetic/piezo blend pedal.</p>
</div>
<p>My design criteria were that the pedal had to work exactly as i wanted and be a 100% passive design, so i wouldn&#8217;t have to mess around with preamps, buffers, batteries, impedance matching and so on. I wanted it to be universally workable for anyone with a magnetic/piezo equipped guitar like a Parker, a Music Man, or any guitar equipped with an aftermarket bridge and preamp from Fishman, L.R. Baggs or GraphTech.</p>
<p>I had to make a few assumptions, the first of which was that the guitar&#8217;s magnetic signal would be buffered by the piezo&#8217;s preamp. I know that GraphTech&#8217;s AcoustiPhonic preamp does. The advantage of this is that a 25 kOhm pot can be used because both circuits are active. If the magnetic signal is not buffered, then a 250 k, 500 k or 1 Meg pot would have to be used. </p>
<p>I found empty wah pedal shells available at <a href="http://www.smallbearelec.com">Small Bear Electronics</a>, bought blend pots through <a href="http://www.stewmac.com">StewMac</a>, found various jacks locally, and set to work creating the first prototype.</p>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHkPFBTLI/AAAAAAAAAhg/Xv67LDFm80M/IMG_1620.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-4-2-18-10-34]" title="Stereo/TRS input."><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHkPFBTLI/AAAAAAAAAhg/Xv67LDFm80M/IMG_1620.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Stereo/TRS input." width="512" height="384" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Stereo/TRS input.</p>
</div>
<p>In my R&#038;D process, i discovered that the automatic stereo/mono switching used in some preamp circuits (such as the AcoustiPhonic and newer Parkers) presented a problem. From my testing, it appeared that a tiny amount of voltage is sent down the piezo (ring) signal wire, and when that voltage is detected on the ground circuit (which would happen when a mono TS plug is inserted in a stereo TRS jack&#8230; the ring would be shorted to ground), the preamp switches into mono mode, sending both magnetic and piezo signals down the &#8220;tip&#8221; of the connector. It&#8217;s my understanding that newer Parkers that lack the red mono/stereo button next to the output jack also work in this way.</p>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHmmf1M9I/AAAAAAAAAhk/mRddsjfdJco/IMG_1624.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-4-2-18-9-18]" title="Dual-mono TS output. A centre detent in the blend pot allows the player to feel the point where both signals are at 100% volume. Pushing forward rolls off the piezo signal, pulling back rolls off the magnetic signal to zero."><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xHmmf1M9I/AAAAAAAAAhk/mRddsjfdJco/IMG_1624.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Dual-mono TS output. A centre detent in the blend pot allows the player to feel the point where both signals are at 100% volume. Pushing forward rolls off the piezo signal, pulling back rolls off the magnetic signal to zero." width="512" height="384" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Dual-mono TS output. A centre detent in the blend pot allows the player to feel the point where both signals are at 100% volume. Pushing forward rolls off the piezo signal, pulling back rolls off the magnetic signal to zero.</p>
</div>
<p>Wiring the pot backwards succesfully isolated the voltage from the guitar&#8217;s onboard preamp, but resulted in a faint &#8220;zipper-like&#8221; sound as the pot was moved through its range. </p>
<p>I worked around it by putting an effects insert in the piezo circuit, where i placed a Tech21 Acoustic DI. This active preamp effectively isolated the voltage from heading back up the ground wire to trip the preamp into mono mode. But it didn&#8217;t meet my &#8220;100% passive&#8221; rule, so i knew i wasn&#8217;t done.</p>
<p>I left it alone for a while, because in my pedalboard at the time, it worked. But as my rig evolved and changed over time, i knew i&#8217;d have to revisit it. Further research into balanced and unbalanced circuits gave me an idea to try a &#8220;pseudo ground lift&#8221; whereby a resistor and a capacitor in line with the ground, which filters any voltage from travelling back up the ground wire. Eureka!</p>
<p>And here i present to you the schematic diagram for the pedal: </p>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xBht4IULI/AAAAAAAAAhQ/8WM0Q-J1cFc/Magnetic_Piezo_blend_pedal_schematic.gif?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-4-2-18-5-33]" title="Circuit schematic for the magnetic/piezo blend pedal."><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S_xBht4IULI/AAAAAAAAAhQ/8WM0Q-J1cFc/Magnetic_Piezo_blend_pedal_schematic.gif?imgmax=512" alt="Circuit schematic for the magnetic/piezo blend pedal." width="512" height="395" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Circuit schematic for the magnetic/piezo blend pedal.</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://decibelguitars.com/files/Magnetic_Piezo_blend_pedal_schematic.pdf">Click here</a> to download it in PDF form.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe in keeping what seems like a common-sense solution a &#8220;secret&#8221;, or trying to apply for a patent for what is essentially a blend pot stuffed into a wah pedal casing. (Chances are, a patent would not be granted for such an obvious solution.) So i&#8217;ve published the schematic here for anyone who wants to DIY their own pedal together, or improve upon my design. </p>
<p>On customer request, i will be including one of these pedals with each Decibel guitar that&#8217;s equipped with a GraphTech AcoustiPhonic piezo system. In my opinion, it&#8217;s the simplest, most elegant way to handle the switching or blending between magnetic and piezo sounds in a hybrid guitar.</p>
<p>Currently, i&#8217;m using a Dunlop-style wah pedal shell from Small Bear, but i would love to be able to retrofit this into an Ernie Ball VP or VP Jr. pedal. Unfortunately, the Ernie Ball pedals use a long-shaft pot, and i have not been successful in sourcing a long-shaft blend pot that would make this retrofit possible. If anyone can point me in the right direction, that would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://decibelguitars.com/the-magneticpiezo-blend-pedal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The art of the kill (switch)</title>
		<link>http://decibelguitars.com/the-art-of-the-kill-switch/</link>
		<comments>http://decibelguitars.com/the-art-of-the-kill-switch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Decibel Guitars</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decibelguitars.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Momentary signal interruptor switches!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One feature that&#8217;s popular among some players is a &#8220;kill&#8221; switch on their guitars. This allows the momentary interruption of the signal by connecting the signal to ground using a pushbutton. Specifically, it&#8217;s a Single-Pole Single-Throw (SPST) Normally Open (NO) Momentary (MOM) Switch.</p>
<p>I have an interesting electronics/surplus store nearby, and while rummaging through the bins there, i came across these:</p>
<p>
<div class="pie-gallery alignGalleryLeft">
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S2dAk103GZI/AAAAAAAAARg/W48Mbgw0Fyw/IMG_4225.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-1-1-16-23-2]" title="Three options for kill switches. Dome, bevel and flat. These are big, &quot;vandal resistant&quot; SPST Normally Open Momentary switches."><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S2dAk103GZI/AAAAAAAAARg/W48Mbgw0Fyw/IMG_4225.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Three options for kill switches. Dome, bevel and flat. These are big, &quot;vandal resistant&quot; SPST Normally Open Momentary switches." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Three options for kill switches. Dome, bevel and flat. These are big, &#8220;vandal resistant&#8221; SPST Normally Open Momentary switches.</p>
</div>
<p><span id="more-354"></span>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S2dAlSrwzsI/AAAAAAAAARk/5XmplnsBuck/IMG_4223.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-1-1-16-23-2]" title="Kill switch options in profile."><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S2dAlSrwzsI/AAAAAAAAARk/5XmplnsBuck/IMG_4223.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Kill switch options in profile." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Kill switch options in profile.</p>
</div>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/Sz1DSf0zwKI/AAAAAAAAACQ/QCy4jbuxWFE/IMG_2020.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-1-1-16-23-2]" title="Just for scale reference, here it is in proportion to a finger."><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/Sz1DSf0zwKI/AAAAAAAAACQ/QCy4jbuxWFE/IMG_2020.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Just for scale reference, here it is in proportion to a finger." width="512" height="384" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Just for scale reference, here it is in proportion to a finger.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><a href="http://decibelguitars.com/proto2">Prototype 2</a> is already the first recipient of one of the dome type buttons, and we have a few more on hand for future builds. Sadly, they only seem to be available in a chrome (or nickel) finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://decibelguitars.com/the-art-of-the-kill-switch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a neck joint</title>
		<link>http://decibelguitars.com/anatomy-of-a-neck-joint/</link>
		<comments>http://decibelguitars.com/anatomy-of-a-neck-joint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Decibel Guitars</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolt-on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tee-nut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decibelguitars.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How we build our bolt-on neck joint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolt-on, set-neck or neck-thru? This question has been kicked around and debated for about as long as the electric guitar has existed. Each has benefits and drawbacks. Since i don&#8217;t favour one method of assembly over another, i will likely be using whichever method is most appropriate or suits my desire or needs at any particular time.</p>
<p>In these early stages of building, i&#8217;ve opted to go for a bolt-on design, for a few reasons. First, the bolt-on design gives maximum versatility. I&#8217;m building guitars with very different body and neck woods. They&#8217;ll all have the same scale length, bolt pattern and neck pocket, so they&#8217;ll be easily interchangeable, so i can experiment with how different neck woods and body woods interact. Second, if anything goes catastrophically wrong at any point in the build, i&#8217;ve only lost a body or a neck. With a set-neck or neck-thru, i&#8217;d have to trash the whole instrument. I&#8217;d rather not do that.</p>
<p>But i won&#8217;t be using just any old bolt-on design. The classic Fender &#8220;bolt-on&#8221; is actually mis-named. The necks are actually <em>screwed</em> on. Bolts are usually threaded to receive a nut. Most &#8220;bolt-on&#8221; necks just use big wood screws and a metal plate (or recessed metal grommets). Not a bad design, but its strength is limited by thin threads biting into wood. Repeated neck removals weaken the joint every single time.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how we&#8217;re building our bolt-on necks:</p>
<p>
<div class="pie-gallery alignGalleryLeft">
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMp1CI0WI/AAAAAAAAAMw/iv9lA-g_gP0/IMG_4199.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-0-6-1-13-29]" title="This mock-up shows the anatomy of a Decibel Guitars bolt-on neck joint. Threaded T-nuts are inserted underneath the fretboard. They are threaded to receive a connector bolt, and have a 3/4&quot; flange and steel prongs that secure it in the wood."><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMp1CI0WI/AAAAAAAAAMw/iv9lA-g_gP0/IMG_4199.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="This mock-up shows the anatomy of a Decibel Guitars bolt-on neck joint. Threaded T-nuts are inserted underneath the fretboard. They are threaded to receive a connector bolt, and have a 3/4&quot; flange and steel prongs that secure it in the wood." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p><span id="more-311"></span>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">This mock-up shows the anatomy of a Decibel Guitars bolt-on neck joint. Threaded T-nuts are inserted underneath the fretboard. They are threaded to receive a connector bolt, and have a 3/4&#8243; flange and steel prongs that secure it in the wood.</p>
</div>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMqWHAuCI/AAAAAAAAAM0/QXf6E_M6t0Q/IMG_4200.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-0-6-1-13-29]" title="The body side of the joint uses a stainless steel washer and large-head connector bolt with a hex socket."><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMqWHAuCI/AAAAAAAAAM0/QXf6E_M6t0Q/IMG_4200.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="The body side of the joint uses a stainless steel washer and large-head connector bolt with a hex socket." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">The body side of the joint uses a stainless steel washer and large-head connector bolt with a hex socket.</p>
</div>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMq69mjXI/AAAAAAAAAM4/rW1Iva8urZI/IMG_4201.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-0-6-1-13-29]" title="This makes for a much more stable neck joint than the wood screws used in traditional &quot;bolt-on&quot; neck joints. Some manufacturers have designed their neck joints so only two of these bolts are needed. Since we are aiming for a thin neck and neck heel, we'll be using four to start, just for maximum stability. We may revise this later."><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMq69mjXI/AAAAAAAAAM4/rW1Iva8urZI/IMG_4201.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="This makes for a much more stable neck joint than the wood screws used in traditional &quot;bolt-on&quot; neck joints. Some manufacturers have designed their neck joints so only two of these bolts are needed. Since we are aiming for a thin neck and neck heel, we'll be using four to start, just for maximum stability. We may revise this later." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">This makes for a much more stable neck joint than the wood screws used in traditional &#8220;bolt-on&#8221; neck joints. Some manufacturers have designed their neck joints so only two of these bolts are needed. Since we are aiming for a thin neck and neck heel, we&#8217;ll be using four to start, just for maximum stability. We may revise this later.</p>
</div>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMrptmlAI/AAAAAAAAAM8/5XxfsMlw1G8/IMG_4203.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-0-6-1-13-29]" title="Here, you can see the stainless steel prongs on the T-nuts, which prevent the nut from spinning as the bolt is torqued. The large flange delivers tremendous downward pressure, maximizing contact between the mating wood surfaces of the neck joint."><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMrptmlAI/AAAAAAAAAM8/5XxfsMlw1G8/IMG_4203.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="Here, you can see the stainless steel prongs on the T-nuts, which prevent the nut from spinning as the bolt is torqued. The large flange delivers tremendous downward pressure, maximizing contact between the mating wood surfaces of the neck joint." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">Here, you can see the stainless steel prongs on the T-nuts, which prevent the nut from spinning as the bolt is torqued. The large flange delivers tremendous downward pressure, maximizing contact between the mating wood surfaces of the neck joint.</p>
</div>
<div class="pie-item" style="margin:10px 10px 10px 10px;">
<p class="pie-img-wrapper"><a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMsAb1B6I/AAAAAAAAANA/1ddcvzpsJEY/IMG_4204.JPG?imgmax=800" rel="lightbox[2010-0-6-1-13-29]" title="A mocked-up cross-section. The thickness of the bolt and T-nut recesses will be carefully measured so there is no chance of the bolt pushing up into the fretboard."><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_V8vzH6r-2mo/S1qMsAb1B6I/AAAAAAAAANA/1ddcvzpsJEY/IMG_4204.JPG?imgmax=512" alt="A mocked-up cross-section. The thickness of the bolt and T-nuts recesses will be carefully measured so there is no chance of the bolt pushing up into the fretboard." width="512" height="340" class="pie-img"/></a></p>
<p class="pie-caption" style="width:512;">A mocked-up cross-section. The thickness of the bolt and T-nuts recesses will be carefully measured so there is no chance of the bolt pushing up into the fretboard.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://decibelguitars.com/anatomy-of-a-neck-joint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
